The
great K-8 debate
by
Keith Look
A
growing body of research shows K-8 schools to be effective in improving student
achievement in the middle grades.
Data
collected in Philadelphia show students from K-8 schools performing better
on standardized tests and displaying higher GPAs in ninth grade than students
from middle schools.
The
School District’s “Empowerment Plan,” drawn up to meet state requirements
for
improving
student test scores, says the system will convert middle schools to K-8 schools
“where feasible.”
Does
the K-8 school solve all the problems of middle grades education?
The
School District of Philadelphia’s recent push for K-8 schools reflects a national
trend, particularly in urban communities.
Like
most “hot” educational reforms, the K-8 school may mistakenly be touted as
a silver bullet. The truth remains that silver bullets are only in the Lone
Ranger’s sidearm and Stephen King novels.
But
K-8 schools are nowhere mentioned in the 1989 watershed Turning Points report
on
middle
grades education or its sequel in 2000. Though there have been major shifts
in state and local education policy to create K-8 schools in Baltimore, Boston,
Cincinnati, Cleveland, Denver, Harrisburg, Hartford, Palm Beach, and Phoenix,
we are still awaiting published results of the impact of these reforms.
There
is never a single, universal answer to education questions. The challenge
becomes determining if, when, where, and how to apply K-8 schooling to Philadelphia’s
middle grades educational settings.
Why
is the K-8 school re-emerging now?
A
school’s grade configuration was once thought to be a permanent fixture of
a school. The K-8 school - which dominated public
education
until the early 1900s - has returned to present day school reform conversations
as one of a number of middle grades interventions (such as "looping",
"teaming", and "advisories") aimed at addressing questions
that trouble middle grades educators, researchers, and policy-makers:
How
can schools increase academic rigor in the middle grades?
What school conditions are necessary to support adolescent identity development?
What interventions aid students’ transitions between grades and between schools?
What role do race, class, and gender play in answering these questions?
The
answers to these questions demonstrate as many alternative philosophies as
years of debate.
By
the early twentieth century, the little red K-8 schoolhouse with its single
classroom and school-marm seemed unable to address the learning needs of adolescents.
The historic Committee of Ten endorsed the potential of the junior high school
as a more effective structure than the K-8 school to increase rigor and boost
middle grades student achievement.
Other
groups advocated for K-6 elementary schools followed by combination 7-12 junior-senior
high schools. In some instances, schools rejected grade configuration changes
entirely and remained K-8. Others pursued yet another design by extending
the K-8 school to educate grades K-12.
In
the School District of Philadelphia, schools using all these different grade
configurations are functioning today.
Why
else might districts and communities pursue K-8 schools?
Not
all movements in favor of K-8 schools emerge from discussions of student achievement
or adolescent development. Nationally, some districts find K-8 schools to
be less expensive to operate than simultaneously running elementary and middle
schools. Other districts convert to K-8 schools to address perceptions of
unruly behavior in the middle schools.
Some
residential communities turned towards K-8 schools as a means to create true
neighborhood schools. The local K-8 school allowed families to avoid sending
children across informal boundaries to the middle school, which serves a broader
geographical area.
Other
communities sought K-8 schools as a way to preserve racial and/or economic
segregation.
What
does the national research say?
Current
national research on K-8 schools may be a shallow body of literature, but
consistent, positive findings surface while wading through it. In a number
of published studies comparing K-8 schools to junior high schools in Milwaukee
and New York City, K-8 schools outperform junior high schools in almost every
category assessed.
In
the 1970s, Milwaukee researchers Simmons and Blyth studied over 600 students
beginning in the sixth grade and followed them through eighth grade. During
this three-year period, some students transitioned from a K-6 school into
junior high school, while others remained in a K-8 school.
The
researchers found that by the end of eighth grade, students in the K-8 school
showed higher self-esteem, less victimization by other students, greater levels
of participation in extracurricular activities, and healthier adolescent development.
In
the 1980s, researcher Denis Moore replicated the Milwaukee study in New York
City. His findings revealed similar advantages of K-8 schools over junior
high schools.
Moore
added the variable of reading achievement to his analysis. Eighth grade reading
scores of the students in the K-8 schools surpassed their counterparts in
junior high schools.
In both the Milwaukee and New York City studies, researchers selected K-8 and junior high schools that demonstrated similar levels of teacher education, racial composition, and economic means to anchor the validity of their comparisons.
![]() |
|
Olney Elementary is one of the School District's many long standing K-8 programs. The District is looking to create more K-8 schools. Photo by: Harvey Finkle |
What
does the local research say?
In
a Philadelphia study conducted in the 1990s, researcher Dr. Robert Offenberg
used a different method of analysis to study a larger sample of K-8 and middle
schools. A statistical technique known as multivariate regression allowed
Offenberg to control for the effects of poverty and race while analyzing school
performance and student achievement.
Offenberg’s
study yields positive results for Philadelphia’s K-8 schools. SAT-9 scores
in reading, math, and science are significantly stronger in K-8 schools than
in middle schools. On the school Performance Index used during the Children
Achieving era, the edge that K-8 schools had over middle schools grew larger
over a two-year period, particularly in math.
Offenberg
also compared the ninth grade performance of students from K-8 schools to
students from middle schools. Results show the percentage of students from
K-8 schools who enroll in the special admit high schools to be more than 11%
higher than the percentage of students from middle schools.
Students
from the K-8 schools also demonstrate a higher Grade Point Average in ninth
grade by approximately one-tenth of a letter grade.
The
Philadelphia study reveals an unanticipated finding as well. Offenberg discovered
that as a school’s number of students per grade (not the total number of students
per school) increases, the performance of K-8 schools and middle schools becomes
more similar. This finding suggests not only that grade configuration may
be a factor in student achievement, but that the number of students per grade
– which is often smaller in a K-8 school – carries significant impact.
Beyond
statistics, what might be advantages of K-8 schools?
Conversations with a number of Philadelphia principals suggest further advantages:
|
Charter
Schools with Middle Grades
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source:
School District of Philadelphia current enrollment reports
|
It
is easier to fill vacancies in the middle grades of a K-8 school than
in a middle school.
A K-8 school is safer than a middle school because older children with younger
family members attending the same school take on the part of protector,
tutor, and role model. In a middle school, the same children must posture
for a reputation, which often leads to the disruption associated with larger
middle schools.
Parental involvement is greater in K-8 schools because parents remain connected
to one school longer and are more likely to have more than one family member
enrolled in the school at the same time.
In a K-8 school, younger and older siblings can travel to and from school
together, avoiding the stress of elementary and middle schools beginning
or ending at different times.
School staff members feel more connected to the community because K-8 schools serve a smaller geographic area than a middle school. Staff members are able to see their influence as the students grow from small children into young adults under their supervision.
One
of the strongest cases for K-8 schools is one Catholic schools cite in maintaining
most of their elementary schools as K-8 schools: more students are more well
known by more adults.
The
early grade teachers know almost every student in the building. Middle grades
teachers can speak with any of them about students’ histories, learning styles,
and family dynamics. These connections mean that each September teachers -
and their students - do not start from square one.
From
the student perspective, the continuity of K-8 schooling may reduce feelings
of anonymity that can result in negative coping mechanisms such as fighting,
displaying a "don’t care" attitude, or self-destruction. Students
can maintain relationships with past teachers they feel most connected with
and find them when they need support, advice, or friendship.
What
drawbacks exist?
Unlike
Philadelphia middle schools, K-8 schools are not automatically allocated an
assistant principal or a school police officer. K-8 schools must squeeze money
from a variety of sources to purchase these positions.
A
K-8 school counselor, of whom there is usually one per elementary school,
must deal with issues that span nine years of development rather than three
or four in a middle school.
It
is important to note that these drawbacks are not permanent conditions. They
result from the District’s formulas for school funding. A School District
committee is investigating the potential inequities associated with resource
allocation
for K-8 schools and related issues such as professional development and capital
expenditures.
(See page 14)
Are
K-8 schools right for Philadelphia?
No
grade configuration in and of itself replaces the ultimate importance of skilled
teachers, visionary leaders, and equitable fiscal resources. Nor is there
any single middle grades intervention that will solve the century-old questions
of adolescent education.
But
for some schools and communities, the K-8 configuration may work. It may be
the
catalyst that brings to fruition the middle grades learning environment that supports students’ and staff members’ pursuit of their potential.
Philadelphia's middle grades programs
|
Notes: The
table at left shows school size and the size of the eighth grade class
at each of the Philadelphia public schools with a program serving the
middle grades (up to grade 8). Enrollment figures are for the current
year. The final column shows the number of student transfer applications
approved and the total number of applicants for the year starting in
fall 2000. All
students (including students with disabilities and ESOL/English Language
Learners) may apply in the fall for admission to any Philadelphia public
school; admission is contingent on meeting any entrance requirements
and availability of space. Neighborhood
schools are open programs, meaning there are no special admission criteria.
Application is through the EH-36 Pupil Transfer Request Form. Students
from the applicant pool are assigned through a computerized lottery
process to fill any available spaces. Placements are announced in the
spring. Most schools have many more applicants than spaces available.
Open spaces are often in the school’s youngest grades. Schools
marked with an The
three special admission middle
schools evaluate applicants based on grades, attendance, and standardized
test scores. Application to these schools is through the EH-38 form. The
two criteria-based schools require completion of a school application
form in addition to the EH-36 form (For Hamilton, the middle grades
program accepts students by application). Each of these schools evaluates
applicants’
records and gives preference to students from the surrounding community.
For
more information on the student
placement process, contact
the Office of Student Placement at 215-299-3688.
|
Source:
School District of Philadelphia