The great K-8 debate

by Keith Look

A growing body of research shows K-8 schools to be effective in improving student achievement in the middle grades.

Data collected in Philadelphia show students from K-8 schools performing better on standardized tests and displaying higher GPAs in ninth grade than students from middle schools.

The School District’s “Empowerment Plan,” drawn up to meet state requirements for

improving student test scores, says the system will convert middle schools to K-8 schools “where feasible.”

Does the K-8 school solve all the problems of middle grades education?

The School District of Philadelphia’s recent push for K-8 schools reflects a national trend, particularly in urban communities.

Like most “hot” educational reforms, the K-8 school may mistakenly be touted as a silver bullet. The truth remains that silver bullets are only in the Lone Ranger’s sidearm and Stephen King novels.

But K-8 schools are nowhere mentioned in the 1989 watershed Turning Points report on

middle grades education or its sequel in 2000. Though there have been major shifts in state and local education policy to create K-8 schools in Baltimore, Boston, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Denver, Harrisburg, Hartford, Palm Beach, and Phoenix, we are still awaiting published results of the impact of these reforms.

There is never a single, universal answer to education questions. The challenge becomes determining if, when, where, and how to apply K-8 schooling to Philadelphia’s middle grades educational settings.

Why is the K-8 school re-emerging now?

A school’s grade configuration was once thought to be a permanent fixture of a school. The K-8 school - which dominated public

education until the early 1900s - has returned to present day school reform conversations as one of a number of middle grades interventions (such as "looping", "teaming", and "advisories") aimed at addressing questions that trouble middle grades educators, researchers, and policy-makers:

The answers to these questions demonstrate as many alternative philosophies as years of debate.

By the early twentieth century, the little red K-8 schoolhouse with its single classroom and school-marm seemed unable to address the learning needs of adolescents. The historic Committee of Ten endorsed the potential of the junior high school as a more effective structure than the K-8 school to increase rigor and boost middle grades student achievement.

Other groups advocated for K-6 elementary schools followed by combination 7-12 junior-senior high schools. In some instances, schools rejected grade configuration changes entirely and remained K-8. Others pursued yet another design by extending the K-8 school to educate grades K-12.

In the School District of Philadelphia, schools using all these different grade configurations are functioning today.

Why else might districts and communities pursue K-8 schools?

Not all movements in favor of K-8 schools emerge from discussions of student achievement or adolescent development. Nationally, some districts find K-8 schools to be less expensive to operate than simultaneously running elementary and middle schools. Other districts convert to K-8 schools to address perceptions of unruly behavior in the middle schools.

Some residential communities turned towards K-8 schools as a means to create true neighborhood schools. The local K-8 school allowed families to avoid sending children across informal boundaries to the middle school, which serves a broader geographical area.

Other communities sought K-8 schools as a way to preserve racial and/or economic segregation.

What does the national research say?

Current national research on K-8 schools may be a shallow body of literature, but consistent, positive findings surface while wading through it. In a number of published studies comparing K-8 schools to junior high schools in Milwaukee and New York City, K-8 schools outperform junior high schools in almost every category assessed.

In the 1970s, Milwaukee researchers Simmons and Blyth studied over 600 students beginning in the sixth grade and followed them through eighth grade. During this three-year period, some students transitioned from a K-6 school into junior high school, while others remained in a K-8 school.

The researchers found that by the end of eighth grade, students in the K-8 school showed higher self-esteem, less victimization by other students, greater levels of participation in extracurricular activities, and healthier adolescent development.

In the 1980s, researcher Denis Moore replicated the Milwaukee study in New York City. His findings revealed similar advantages of K-8 schools over junior high schools.

Moore added the variable of reading achievement to his analysis. Eighth grade reading scores of the students in the K-8 schools surpassed their counterparts in junior high schools.

In both the Milwaukee and New York City studies, researchers selected K-8 and junior high schools that demonstrated similar levels of teacher education, racial composition, and economic means to anchor the validity of their comparisons.

Olney Elementary is one of the School District's many long standing K-8 programs. The District is looking to create more K-8 schools. Photo by: Harvey Finkle

What does the local research say?

In a Philadelphia study conducted in the 1990s, researcher Dr. Robert Offenberg used a different method of analysis to study a larger sample of K-8 and middle schools. A statistical technique known as multivariate regression allowed Offenberg to control for the effects of poverty and race while analyzing school performance and student achievement.

Offenberg’s study yields positive results for Philadelphia’s K-8 schools. SAT-9 scores in reading, math, and science are significantly stronger in K-8 schools than in middle schools. On the school Performance Index used during the Children Achieving era, the edge that K-8 schools had over middle schools grew larger over a two-year period, particularly in math.

Offenberg also compared the ninth grade performance of students from K-8 schools to students from middle schools. Results show the percentage of students from K-8 schools who enroll in the special admit high schools to be more than 11% higher than the percentage of students from middle schools.

Students from the K-8 schools also demonstrate a higher Grade Point Average in ninth grade by approximately one-tenth of a letter grade.

The Philadelphia study reveals an unanticipated finding as well. Offenberg discovered that as a school’s number of students per grade (not the total number of students per school) increases, the performance of K-8 schools and middle schools becomes more similar. This finding suggests not only that grade configuration may be a factor in student achievement, but that the number of students per grade – which is often smaller in a K-8 school – carries significant impact.

Beyond statistics, what might be advantages of K-8 schools?

Conversations with a number of Philadelphia principals suggest further advantages:

Charter Schools with Middle Grades   
Charter School
Grades served
Total Enrollment
DeHostos CS
4-8
200
Freire CS
8-9
147
Germantown Settlement CS
5-8
506
Harambee Institute CS
K-8
240
Imani Education Circle CS
K-8
387
Laboratory CS
K-8
403
Mariana Bracetti CS
6-9
143
Math, Science and Technology CS
K-12
923
Mathematics, Civics and Sciences CS
1-12
742
New Foundations CS
4-8
351
Philadelphia Academy CS
K-8
644
Community Academy of Phila. CS
6-12
250
Renaissance CS
6-8
152
Wakisha CS
6-7
264
West Oak Lane CS
K-9
554
World Communications CS
6-12

450

Young ScholarsCS
6-7 
  113
Source: School District of Philadelphia current enrollment reports

One of the strongest cases for K-8 schools is one Catholic schools cite in maintaining most of their elementary schools as K-8 schools: more students are more well known by more adults.

The early grade teachers know almost every student in the building. Middle grades teachers can speak with any of them about students’ histories, learning styles, and family dynamics. These connections mean that each September teachers - and their students - do not start from square one.

From the student perspective, the continuity of K-8 schooling may reduce feelings of anonymity that can result in negative coping mechanisms such as fighting, displaying a "don’t care" attitude, or self-destruction. Students can maintain relationships with past teachers they feel most connected with and find them when they need support, advice, or friendship.

What drawbacks exist?

In Philadelphia, the District classifies K-8 schools as "elementary" schools. In practice this means that the middle grades of a K-8 school are funded at a lower level than the middle grades of a middle school.

Unlike Philadelphia middle schools, K-8 schools are not automatically allocated an assistant principal or a school police officer. K-8 schools must squeeze money from a variety of sources to purchase these positions.

A K-8 school counselor, of whom there is usually one per elementary school, must deal with issues that span nine years of development rather than three or four in a middle school.

It is important to note that these drawbacks are not permanent conditions. They result from the District’s formulas for school funding. A School District committee is investigating the potential inequities associated with resource

allocation for K-8 schools and related issues such as professional development and capital

expenditures. (See page 14)

Are K-8 schools right for Philadelphia?

No grade configuration in and of itself replaces the ultimate importance of skilled teachers, visionary leaders, and equitable fiscal resources. Nor is there any single middle grades intervention that will solve the century-old questions of adolescent education.

But for some schools and communities, the K-8 configuration may work. It may be the

catalyst that brings to fruition the middle grades learning environment that supports students’ and staff members’ pursuit of their potential.

 

Philadelphia's middle grades programs

Neighborhood Middle Schools
Neighborhood High Schools
Grades Served
Total Enrollment
8th Grade Enrollment
Transfers Approved/Requests
   
Barratt, Norris S. Audenried
5-8
796
215
0/10
Central East Olney
5-8
1100
275
0/9
Clemente, Roberto Olney
5-8
1392
357
0/0
Cooke, Jay Olney
5-8
818
253
0/3
*Jones, John Paul Kensington
5-8
1076
388
14/33
Peirce, William S. Audenried
5-8
441
125
0/55
*Penn Treaty Kensington
5-8
853
260
0/27
*Pepper, George W. Bartram
5-8
1012
309
0/98
Pickett, Clarence E. Germantown
5-8
707
233
0/9
Rhodes, E. Washington Strawberry Man.
5-8
1111
318
0/35
Shaw, Anna Howard West Phila.
5-8
812
227
0/33
*Stetson, John B. Edison
5-8
1064
345
0/23
*Thomas, George C. South Phila.
5-8
514
145
7/138
Tilden, William T. Bartram
5-8
1367
313
0/36
Turner, John P. Bartram
5-8
972
325
0/46
*Vare, Edwin South Phila.
5-8
823
232
0/89
Vaux, Roberts Franklin
5-8
790
241
0/14
Washington, Grover Fels
5-8
820
*
0/0
*Baldi, C.C.A. Washington
6-8
1142
415
0/166
Beeber, Dimner Overbrook
6-8
1066
359
0/89
DeBurgos, Julia Bilingual Edison
6-8
806
344
0/21
Elverson, James Penn
6-8
489
168
0/32
FitzSimons, Thomas Gratz
6-8
830
293
0/12
Gillespie, Elizabeth Duane Gratz
6-8
916
310
2/6
*Harding, Warren G. Frankford
6-8
1188
416
0/25
*LaBrum, General J. Harry Washington
6-8
369
126
42/181
Leeds, Morris E. King
6-8
732
256
6/44
Lewis, Ada H. H. King
6-8
842
263
0/25
*Meehan, Austin Lincoln
6-8
935
303
38/216
Roosevelt, Theodore Germantown
6-8
914
327
0/23
*Rush, Benjamin Washington
6-8
1108
455
65/123
Sayre, William C. West Phila.
6-8
1175
316
0/22
Shoemaker, William H. Overbrook
6-8
777
248
0/14
Stoddart-Fleisher Franklin
6-8
363
127
0/20
Sulzberger, Mayer University City
6-8
916
303
0/7
Wagner, Gen. Louis King
6-8
885
317
0/10
Wanamaker, John Penn
6-8
594
195
0/35
*Wilson, Woodrow Northeast
6-8
1284
432
9/171
Strawberry Man. Middle/High Strawberry Man.
7-12
1521
177
0/0
 
Neighborhood K-8 Schools  
Adaire, Alexander Kensington
K-8
622
93
0/8
Alcorn, James Audenried
K-8
1151
92
0/7
*Allen, Ethan Lincoln
K-8
709
100
0/185
*Bache/Martin Franklin
K-8
709
87
42/434
*Carnell, Laura Fels
K-8
1336
151
0/71
*Creighton, Thomas Fels
K-8
893
111
0/40
*Disston, Hamilton Lincoln
K-8
731
98
11/122
*Dobson, James Roxborough
K-8
289
50
39/133
Drew, Charles Richard University City
K-8
506
63
0/46
*Edmunds, Henry R. Frankford
K-8
1236
138
0/71
*Farrell, Louis H. Northeast
K-8
862
116
28/297
*Finletter, Thomas K. Fels
K-8
1247
161
0/154
*Franklin, Benjamin Elem. Fels
K-8
1015
96
0/94
*Greenberg, Joseph J. Washington
K-8
581
59
10/213
*Greenfield, Albert M. South Phila.
K-8
712
77
10/1457
*Henry, Charles W. Germantown
K-8
732
98
16/490
*Hopkinson, Francis Frankford
K-8
924
83
0/52
*Houston, Henry H. Germantown
K-8
778
101
15/410
*Jackson, Andrew Furness
K-8
292
37
2/80
*Jenks, John Story Germantown
K-8
512
63
36/722
*Kirkbride, Eliza Butler Furness
K-8
577
72
0/23
Lea, Henry C. West Phila.
K-8
844
118
0/75
*Levering, William Roxborough
K-8
383
96
10/145
Marin, Luis Munoz Edison
K-8
745
64
0/0
*Marshall, Thurgood Olney
K-8
829
78
0/0
*Mayfair Lincoln
K-8
592
61
0/258
*McCall, Gen. George A. Furness
K-8
542
70
11/577
McMichael, Morton University City
K-8
598
57
0/6
*Meredith, William M. Furness
K-8
472
63
0/502
*Mifflin, Thomas Roxborough
K-8
321
49
30/50
*Morrison, Andrew J. Olney
K-8
1011
74
0/9
Nebinger, George W. Furness
K-8
278
28
1/38
*Olney Elementary Olney
K-8
747
60
0/34
Palumbo, Frank Audenried
K-8
139
19
18/26
Sharswood, George Furness
K-8
396
50
0/23
*Shawmont Roxborough
K-8
697
92
23/504
*Southwark South Phila.
K-8
649
91
9/74
*Spruance, Gilbert Northeast
K-8
1169
137
3/168
Stanton, Edwin M. Audenried
K-8
331
38
0/16
*Taggart, John H. Furness
K-8
647
64
0/72
*Vare, Abigail Furness
K-8
605
55
0/39
Washington, Geo. Elementary Furness
K-8
409
60
0/28
Washington, Martha University City
K-8
464
55
0/43
*Ziegler, William H. Fels
K-8
371
37
2/85
Kenderton Gratz
PreK-8
785
88
0/10
Ludlow, James R. Kensington
PreK-8
515
39
0/0
*Lamberton, Robert E. Overbrook
K-12
1640
167
0/440
 
Citywide Schools  
*AMY at James Martin  
6-8
368
100
153/454
*AMY Northwest  
6-8
240
79
91/577
*Fitler, Edwin H.  
1-8
436
60
68/587
*MYA (Middle Years Alternative)  
5-8
243
61
44/577
*Overbrook Educational Center  
1-8
293
44
26/514
 
Special Admission Schools  
*Conwell, Russell A. Magnet  
5-8
868
231
297/1165
*Girard Academic Music Program (GAMP)  
5-12
497
65
52/611
*Masterman, Julia R. Middle/High  
5-12
752
197
226/1544
 
Criteria-based schools  
Hamilton, Andrew  
K-8
798
47
53/246
*Hill, Joseph E./Samson Freedman  
6-8
249
75
50/269

Notes:

The table at left shows school size and the size of the eighth grade class at each of the Philadelphia public schools with a program serving the middle grades (up to grade 8). Enrollment figures are for the current year. The final column shows the number of student transfer applications approved and the total number of applicants for the year starting in fall 2000.

Philadelphia has over 40 K-8 schools. But a majority of Philadelphia’s elementary schools end at grade 4, 5, or 6. Students completing these schools are placed in their neighborhood middle school unless they file a transfer application.

All students (including students with disabilities and ESOL/English Language Learners) may apply in the fall for admission to any Philadelphia public school; admission is contingent on meeting any entrance requirements and availability of space.

Neighborhood schools are open programs, meaning there are no special admission criteria. Application is through the EH-36 Pupil Transfer Request Form.

Students from the applicant pool are assigned through a computerized lottery process to fill any available spaces. Placements are announced in the spring. Most schools have many more applicants than spaces available. Open spaces are often in the school’s youngest grades.

Schools marked with an asterisk (*) are part of the School District’s desegregation plan. At these schools, race is factored into the admissions process in order to improve racial balance.

The five citywide schools shown are also open programs. Applicants are selected through a computerized lottery process.

The three special admission middle schools evaluate applicants based on grades, attendance, and standardized test scores. Application to these schools is through the EH-38 form.

The two criteria-based schools require completion of a school application form in addition to the EH-36 form (For Hamilton, the middle grades program accepts students by application). Each of these schools evaluates

applicants’ records and gives preference to students from the surrounding community.

For more information on the

student placement process,

contact the Office of Student Placement at 215-299-3688.

Grover Washington Middle School is a new school, and does not yet have an eighth grade.

 

Source: School District of Philadelphia